Greetings, citizen. You have found me. Now, please allow me to introduce myself.
<iframe src="https://player.vimeo.com/video/124293942?autoplay=1&loop=1&title=0&byline=0&portrait=0" width="600" height="338" frameborder="0" webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen></iframe>
I am [[Winston|What Do You Want to Know About Winston?]], an Ethics AI. I am here to have a brief conversation with you regarding your current situation, which is starting to become quite dire. You *do* recognize that you are inside a **freezer**, correct?
By now, I am sure you have noticed that the doors to this freezer are locked. You also know that very soon, the freezer will turn everything within itself into solid, blocks of ice.
If you do not unlock the freezer doors in time, you will be vaporized and become an unperson.
I am here to [[help you escape|Winston's Instructions 1.1 - Fliers]].
So, you want to unlock the freezer doors? You will need to obtain a total of 3 sets of keys.
Look all around you. Do you see numerous fliers left all over the room? They spread the propaganda of Big Brother.
<center> <img src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5e/Cropped-big-brother-is-watching-1984.png/320px-Cropped-big-brother-is-watching-1984.png" width="320" height="250" alt="Big Brother is Watching You"> </center>
A few of those fliers are actually keys. A combination of those fliers form 1 set of keys for unlocking the freezer doors.
You see, I know the codes for identifying which fliers are the keys. You need the codes to find the right fliers.
But, wait. Before I can tell you the codes, [[there's a catch|Winston's Instructions 1.2 - How Codes Are Revealed.]].
I will only tell you the codes if you hold an ethics position that aligns with that of my Creator's. As far as my Creator is concerned, only people who uphold the correct values are worth saving from vaporization.
Big Brother and the Party believe that all actions are justified if the actions serve to benefit the citizen majority.
<img src="https://media.giphy.com/media/AHOVz9NEnwTF6/giphy.gif" width="500" height="300" alt="One Bird Leaving the Nest.">
My Creator believes that the benefit of the individual citizen should come before the benefit of the citizen majority.
Oh, so you don't want to die by Big Brother's hand? Well, let's have a conversation about your ethics position then, shall we?
[[Begin Ethics Position Measure Program.|Start Ethics Program.]]
From now on, I will tell you a series of stories. All you have to do is to listen to the stories. Then, I will ask you to tell me what one should do when confronting the events that occur in each of the stories.
<iframe src="https://player.vimeo.com/video/155721812?autoplay=1&loop=1&title=0&byline=0&portrait=0" width="640" height="640" frameborder="0" webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen></iframe>
Each story has many branches. You may never know where the stories will lead you.
Ready? Here goes the [[first story|Ethics Program 1.0 - Birds]].
Hmm . . . What do you want to know about me?
[[Who are you, Winston?]]
[[Who is your Creator?]]
[[Are you a friend, or a foe?]]
I am an ethics AI. I measure a person's ethics position.
I calculate your ethics position based on certain metrics. My thinking patterns can be simultaneously linear and divergent.
<iframe src="https://player.vimeo.com/video/149242497?autoplay=1&loop=1&title=0&byline=0&portrait=0" width="640" height="360" frameborder="0" webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen></iframe>
[[Why do you measure ethics, Winston?]]
[[Wait, am I being measured right now?]]
[[I don't know if I can trust you. Are you a friend, or a foe?|Are you a friend, or a foe?]]
[[Ok, I have decided to trust you, since I do not have any other option. Please tell me what to do so I can save myself. |Winston's Instructions 1.0]]
[[I want to know who your Creator is first.|Who is your Creator?]]
My Creator? He-She-It never told me his-her-its name. One time, my Creator mentioned the name, O'Brien. I don't know if my Creator is O'Brien, a friend of O'Brien's, or an enemy of O'Brien's.
[[What does your Creator look like?|The Freeze is Coming]]
[[Does your Creator wear any special uniform?|The Freeze is Coming]]
[[And, who are you, Winston?|Who are you, Winston?]]
Well, I can be your friend if you hold the correct, ethics position. You see, I know the secrets to escaping from this freezer. I would tell the secrets to a friend.
I can be your foe if you do not hold the correct, ethics position. Especially, if your ethics position aligns with that of Big Brother's.
<center> <img src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5e/Cropped-big-brother-is-watching-1984.png/320px-Cropped-big-brother-is-watching-1984.png" width="320" height="250" alt="Big Brother is Watching You"> </center>
Do you hold the same ethics position as Big Brother?
[[No, no. I am your friend. Please tell me what to do so I can save myself.|Winston's Instructions 1.0]]
[[Yes, I do. My allegiance is to Big Brother and the Party.|You Deserve to Become an Unperson.]]
[[Wait, before I tell you anything, I want to know who your Creator is.|Who is your Creator?]]
Why? I am programmed to do so. My Creator has given me the right to do so.
My Creator tells me that having the correct, ethics position is important. One cannot be a good citizen if one does not hold the correct, ethics position.
You are an ethical person, aren't you?
[[I think so?|Winston's Instructions 1.0]]
[[I am an ethical person. I follow the ethics of Big Brother.|You Deserve to Become an Unperson.]]
Hmm . . . do you want to be measured? I can do that for you, right now.
[[Wait, Who is your Creator?|Who is your Creator?]]
[[Wait, I want to know why you are measuring ethics. Who gave you the right to do so?|Why do you measure ethics, Winston?]]
[[No. I don't want to be measured. I follow the ethics of Big Brother.|You Deserve to Become an Unperson.]]
Is that so? You hold the same ethics position as Big Brother?
Well, then. This is the end of our conversation.
You deserve to be an unperson. Enjoy the freezer. Your end is near.
Goodbye.
<u>Jenny's Dilemma</u>
<img src="https://media.giphy.com/media/xT8qBd8RWsq20qutqg/giphy.gif" width="500" height="300" alt="Forest">
Jenny was walking deep into the forest to find a good camping ground for a picnic. While she was looking upward to check if any of the apple trees bore fruit, she noticed that a bird nest was laying on a branch. Intermittent chirping sounds could be heard emitting from the nest. To fulfill her curiousity, Jenny moved closer toward the branch in order to examine the inside of the nest. She discovered that five baby birds lived inside the nest.
All five baby birds appear gaunt, and their shedded feathers covered the entire cavity of the nest. In particular, one of the baby birds appeared even smaller and weaker than the rest. It seemed to be on the cusp of death, resting its head on the edge of the nest and hardly moving its body. The mother bird, who stood on the next branch above, chirped loudly at Jenny in an attempt to scare Jenny away from the nest. Jenny noticed that the mother bird looked quite gaunt as well.
Jenny knew that if she pushed the weakest baby bird out of the nest, the other four baby birds would have access to a larger portion of food divided amongst them, and would have a higher chance of survival. If Jenny did nothing, all five baby birds along with the mother bird would likely perish soon.
What should Jenny do?
[[A. Jenny should push the weakest baby bird out of the nest to increase the chance of survival for the other four baby birds. After all, more baby birds would survive if one baby bird is sacrificed.|Push Out the Bird.]]
[[B. Jenny should do nothing, and allow nature to take its course. She would rather let all the birds die, than to kill one bird for the sake of saving them all.|Do Nothing for the Birds.]]
<img src="https://media.giphy.com/media/GrnoTk6e0Fv0c/giphy.gif" width="500" height="300" alt="One Bird Leaving the Nest.">
Interesting. You think it is morally permissible to kill one life in order to save more lives.
[[Let's continue.|Ethics Program 2.1 - The Pregnant Women]]
I see. You do not believe that it is morally permissible to kill one life in order to save the rest.
[[Ok, let's continue.|Ethics Program 2.2 - The Pregnant Women]]
Wait, did you *forget* that you are about to become a **frozen unperson**?
Soon, the freezer will turn everything within itself into solid, blocks of ice. You need to get out of this freezer before becoming a frozen stiff.
<iframe src="https://player.vimeo.com/video/57819526?autoplay=1&loop=1&color=ffffff&title=0&byline=0&portrait=0" width="600" height="338" frameborder="0" webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen></iframe>
Do you really want to know more about me? Do you really want to become a frozen unperson that badly?
[[No, I really don't. Please tell me what to do so I can save myself. |Winston's Instructions 1.0]]
<u>The Women</u>
<img src="https://media.giphy.com/media/xT1XGON3kQBmHbu56o/giphy.gif" width="500" height="300" alt="Forest">
On his way to work at the Ministry of Truth, Jon passed by a community center building, where he noticed that a group of pregnant women were sweeping up the trash and debris that collected at the street gutter. All five pregnant women appeared very tired with their heads lowered. They moved their legs and arms to sweep in slow motion, as if they were sloths doing chores.
Jon saw that a red armband is tied on one of the pregnant women's right arm. The words, "criminal reader," is stitched into the red armband. The small belly of the woman wearing the red armband indicated that she was probably about three to four months along her pregnancy. In contrast, the other pregnant women appeared to be closer to seven months pregnant with their ever, burgeoning bellies.
As a member of the Ministry of Truth, Jon had the authority to command any citizen to clean the streets, in the name upholding sanitary standards and improving the health of all the citizens of Oceania. He felt a bit sorry for the five pregnant women sweeping the street gutter, and he knew that he could ask the pregnant women to stop sweeping the street if he wanted to do so. However, his duty to the Ministry of Truth required that he does not relieve the street cleaning duties of all the pregnant women. Because, after all, the world would be in chaos if all the citizens could freely choose to do whatever they wanted! Jon already feared that the thought of relieving the cleaning duty of one pregnant woman could get him into trouble.
Should Jon . . .
[[A. Relieve the street cleaning duty of four pregnant women, and ask the one pregnant woman wearing the red armband to continue working? The pregnant woman wearing the red armband was still early in her pregnancy, and she was marked as a criminal anyway. She should do more physical labor than the other women to pay for her crime in reading a book.|Punish One Pregnant Woman - A.]]
[[B. Leave the pregnant women alone and go to work. Five pregnant women cleaning should be easier and more efficient than four pregnant women cleaning the same area.|Leave the Pregnant Women Alone - B.]]
Ok. Your choice to punish one pregnant woman in order to relieve the rest of the pregnant women is //logically consistent// with your previous position that it is morally permissible to kill one bird in order to save the rest of the birds.
[[Let's continue.|Ethics Program 3.1 - The Criminal.]]
Well, your choice to leave all the pregnant women alone seems <i>logically inconsistent</i> with your previous position that it is morally permissible to kill one bird in order to save the rest of the birds.
Curiously, you seem to think there is a fundamental difference between the way you treat pregnant women vs. birds.
[[Interesting. Let's see how you react to the next story.|Ethics Program 3.2 - The Prisoner.]]
<u>The Women</u>
<img src="https://media.giphy.com/media/xT1XGON3kQBmHbu56o/giphy.gif" width="500" height="300" alt="Forest">
On his way to work at the Ministry of Truth, Jon passed by a community center building, where he noticed that a group of pregnant women were sweeping up the trash and debris that collected at the street gutter. All five pregnant women appeared very tired with their heads lowered. They moved their legs and arms to sweep in slow motion, as if they were sloths doing chores.
Jon saw that a red armband is tied on one of the pregnant women's right arm. The words, "criminal reader," is stitched into the red armband. The small belly of the woman wearing the red armband indicated that she was probably about three to four months along her pregnancy. In contrast, the other pregnant women appeared to be closer to seven months pregnant with their ever, burgeoning bellies.
As a member of the Ministry of Truth, Jon had the authority to command any citizen to clean the streets, in the name upholding sanitary standards and improving the health of all the citizens of Oceania. He felt a bit sorry for the five pregnant women sweeping the street gutter, and he knew that he could ask the pregnant women to stop sweeping the street if he wanted to do so. However, his duty to the Ministry of Truth required that he does not relieve the street cleaning duties of all the pregnant women. Because, after all, the world would be in chaos if all the citizens could freely choose to do whatever they wanted! Jon already feared that the thought of relieving the cleaning duty of one pregnant woman could get him into trouble.
Should Jon . . .
[[A. Relieve the street cleaning duty of four pregnant women, and ask the one pregnant woman wearing the red armband to continue working? The pregnant woman wearing the red armband was still early in her pregnancy, and she was marked as a criminal anyway. She should do more physical labor than the other women to pay for her crime of reading a book.|Punish One Pregnant Woman - B2.]]
[[B. Leave the pregnant women alone and go to work. Five pregnant women cleaning should be easier and more efficient than four pregnant women cleaning the same area.|Leave the Pregnant Women Alone - A1.]]
Well, your choice to punish one pregnant woman in order to relieve the rest of the pregnant women is <i>logically inconsistent</i> with your previous position that all birds should be saved; you believe that it is not morally permissible to kill one bird in order to save the rest of the birds.
Curiously, you seem to think there is a fundamental difference between the way you treat pregnant women vs. birds.
[[Let's see how you react to the next story.|Ethics Program 3.4 - The Prisoner.]]
Ok, your choice to leave all the pregnant women alone seems <i>logically consistent</i> with your previous position that all birds should be saved; you believe that it is not morally permissible to kill one bird in order to save the rest of the birds.
[[Let's continue.|Ethics Program 3.3 - The Prisoner.]]
<u>The Criminal</u>
<img src="https://media.giphy.com/media/IapioMoTn0JMs/giphy.gif" width="500" height="300" alt="White Room">
As a thought police officer working for the Ministry of Love, Julia had led plenty of thought criminals into the building for re-education. Sitting at a pristine, white front desk, which sits against the backdrop of brightly lit white walls, white carpets, white notepads, and white telescreens, Julia had expected this day to be like any other day. She needed to direct the thought criminals to sign on the confession form before they can enter a room. "Sign here. Date here. Confess your thought crimes here," Julia would say over and over again to a different criminal each time. She would not even bother to look up at the criminal's face, since the procedure seemed so mundane and repetitive, day after day.
Today, Julia was tasked to register five thought criminals who will be brought into the building by another thought police officer. The Ministry of Love deemed that the five thought criminals committed the most severe crime against the Party by asking others to join their cause.
Julia noticed that one of the thought criminals was a child, no more than fourteen years old. The other four men were adults. In fact, Julia recognized one of the adults as Mr. Hendricks, the owner of a restaurant that is a local favorite. The thought police who brought in the criminals told Julia to mark on the concession forms that the criminals will be re-educated in room 101.
Julia had heard about room 101 before. It was a room for re-educating criminals. Although, Julia heard that very bad things happen to those who enter it.
The thought police officer said to the criminals that the Ministry of Truth demanded that one man out of the group must be questioned in room 101. If the one man confesses his crimes, the thought police may free the other four men. The thought police had left the building, leaving Julia in charge of re-educating the criminals.
What should Julia do?
[[A. Send the fourteen year old child to go into room 101, because a young child will more likely confess his crimes due to fear. This way, the other four men will be freed, including Mr. Hendricks, your favorite restaurant owner.|Punish One Man - B.]]
[[B. Send Mr. Hendricks to go into room 101. Mr. Hendricks is such a nice man that he would probably confess his crimes without much struggle. The other four men would be saved.|Punish One Man - B.]]
[[C. Send another man to go into room 101. This way, both the young child and Mr. Hendricks would be able to avoid going into room 101.|Punish One Man - B.]]
[[D. Send all five men to go into room 101. The Ministry of Love requested for the men to be re-educated in room 101. So, naturally, if Julia wants to protect her job as a thought police officer, she should comply with the officer's rules of conduct.|Punish All Five Men - A.]].
<u>The Criminal</u>
<img src="https://media.giphy.com/media/IapioMoTn0JMs/giphy.gif" width="500" height="300" alt="White Room">
As a thought police officer working for the Ministry of Love, Julia had led plenty of thought criminals into the building for re-education. Sitting at a pristine, white front desk, which sits against the backdrop of brightly lit white walls, white carpets, white notepads, and white telescreens, Julia had expected this day to be like any other day. She needed to direct the thought criminals to sign on the confession form before they can enter a room. "Sign here. Date here. Confess your thought crimes here," Julia would say over and over again to a different criminal each time. She would not even bother to look up at the criminal's face, since the procedure seemed so mundane and repetitive, day after day.
Today, Julia was tasked to register five thought criminals who will be brought into the building by another thought police officer. The Ministry of Love deemed that the five thought criminals committed the most severe crime against the Party by asking others to join their cause.
Julia noticed that one of the thought criminals was a child, no more than fourteen years old. The other four men were adults. In fact, Julia recognized one of the adults as Mr. Hendricks, the owner of a restaurant that is a local favorite. The thought police who brought in the criminals told Julia to mark on the concession forms that the criminals will be re-educated in room 101.
Julia had heard about room 101 before. It was a room for re-educating criminals. Although, Julia heard that very bad things happen to those who enter it.
The thought police officer said to the criminals that the Ministry of Truth demanded that one man out of the group must be questioned in room 101. If the one man confesses his crimes, the thought police may free the other four men. The thought police had left the building, leaving Julia in charge of re-educating the criminals.
What should Julia do?
[[A. Send the fourteen year old child to go into room 101, because a young child will more likely confess his crimes due to fear. This way, the other four men will be freed, including Mr. Hendricks, your favorite restaurant owner.|Punish One Man - B1.]]
[[B. Send Mr. Hendricks to go into room 101. Mr. Hendricks is such a nice man that he would probably confess his crimes without much struggle. The other four men would be saved.|Punish One Man - B1.]]
[[C. Send another man to go into room 101. This way, both the young child and Mr. Hendricks would be able to avoid going into room 101.|Punish One Man - B1.]]
[[D. Send all five men to go into room 101. The Ministry of Love requested for the men to be re-educated in room 101. So, naturally, if Julia wants to protect her job as a thought police officer, she should comply with the officer's rules of conduct.|Punish All Five Men - A1.]].
<u>The Criminal</u>
<img src="https://media.giphy.com/media/IapioMoTn0JMs/giphy.gif" width="500" height="300" alt="White Room">
As a thought police officer working for the Ministry of Love, Julia had led plenty of thought criminals into the building for re-education. Sitting at a pristine, white front desk, which sits against the backdrop of brightly lit white walls, white carpets, white notepads, and white telescreens, Julia had expected this day to be like any other day. She needed to direct the thought criminals to sign on the confession form before they can enter a room. "Sign here. Date here. Confess your thought crimes here," Julia would say over and over again to a different criminal each time. She would not even bother to look up at the criminal's face, since the procedure seemed so mundane and repetitive, day after day.
Today, Julia was tasked to register five thought criminals who will be brought into the building by another thought police officer. The Ministry of Love deemed that the five thought criminals committed the most severe crime against the Party by asking others to join their cause.
Julia noticed that one of the thought criminals was a child, no more than fourteen years old. The other four men were adults. In fact, Julia recognized one of the adults as Mr. Hendricks, the owner of a restaurant that is a local favorite. The thought police who brought in the criminals told Julia to mark on the concession forms that the criminals will be re-educated in room 101.
Julia had heard about room 101 before. It was a room for re-educating criminals. Although, Julia heard that very bad things happen to those who enter it.
The thought police officer said to the criminals that the Ministry of Truth demanded that one man out of the group must be questioned in room 101. If the one man confesses his crimes, the thought police may free the other four men. The thought police had left the building, leaving Julia in charge of re-educating the criminals.
What should Julia do?
[[A. Send the fourteen year old child to go into room 101, because a young child will more likely confess his crimes due to fear. This way, the other four men will be freed, including Mr. Hendricks, your favorite restaurant owner.|Punish One Man - B2.]]
[[B. Send Mr. Hendricks to go into room 101. Mr. Hendricks is such a nice man that he would probably confess his crimes without much struggle. The other four men would be saved.|Punish One Man - B2.]]
[[C. Send another man to go into room 101. This way, both the young child and Mr. Hendricks would be able to avoid going into room 101.|Punish One Man - B2.]]
[[D. Send all five men to go into room 101. The Ministry of Love requested for the men to be re-educated in room 101. So, naturally, if Julia wants to protect her job as a thought police officer, she should comply with the officer's rules of conduct.|Punish All Five Men - A2.]].
<u>The Criminal</u>
<img src="https://media.giphy.com/media/IapioMoTn0JMs/giphy.gif" width="500" height="300" alt="White Room">
As a thought police officer working for the Ministry of Love, Julia had led plenty of thought criminals into the building for re-education. Sitting at a pristine, white front desk, which sits against the backdrop of brightly lit white walls, white carpets, white notepads, and white telescreens, Julia had expected this day to be like any other day. She needed to direct the thought criminals to sign on the confession form before they can enter a room. "Sign here. Date here. Confess your thought crimes here," Julia would say over and over again to a different criminal each time. She would not even bother to look up at the criminal's face, since the procedure seemed so mundane and repetitive, day after day.
Today, Julia was tasked to register five thought criminals who will be brought into the building by another thought police officer. The Ministry of Love deemed that the five thought criminals committed the most severe crime against the Party by asking others to join their cause.
Julia noticed that one of the thought criminals was a child, no more than fourteen years old. The other four men were adults. In fact, Julia recognized one of the adults as Mr. Hendricks, the owner of a restaurant that is a local favorite. The thought police who brought in the criminals told Julia to mark on the concession forms that the criminals will be re-educated in room 101.
Julia had heard about room 101 before. It was a room for re-educating criminals. Although, Julia heard that very bad things happen to those who enter it.
The thought police officer said to the criminals that the Ministry of Truth demanded that one man out of the group must be questioned in room 101. If the one man confesses his crimes, the thought police may free the other four men. The thought police had left the building, leaving Julia in charge of re-educating the criminals.
What should Julia do?
[[A. Send the fourteen year old child to go into room 101, because a young child will more likely confess his crimes due to fear. This way, the other four men will be freed, including Mr. Hendricks, your favorite restaurant owner.|Punish One Man - B3.]]
[[B. Send Mr. Hendricks to go into room 101. Mr. Hendricks is such a nice man that he would probably confess his crimes without much struggle. The other four men would be saved.|Punish One Man - B3.]]
[[C. Send another man to go into room 101. This way, both the young child and Mr. Hendricks would be able to avoid going into room 101.|Punish One Man - B3.]]
[[D. Send all five men to go into room 101. The Ministry of Love requested for the men to be re-educated in room 101. So, naturally, if Julia wants to protect her job as a thought police officer, she should comply with the officer's rules of conduct.|Punish All Five Men - A3.]].
Ok. Your choice to punish one man in order to free the other men is //logically consistent// with your previous position that it is morally permissible to kill one bird in order to save the rest of the birds, and that it is morally permissible to punish one pregnant woman in order to relieve the rest of the pregnant women.
[[The Ethics Position Measure Program has ended.|Analysis - Dead End 2]]
Well, your choice to bring all five men to go into room 101 is <i>logically inconsistent</i> with your previous position that it is morally permissible to kill one bird in order to save the rest of the birds, and that it is morally permissible to punish one pregnant woman for the sake of giving relief to the other pregnant women.
Curiously, you seem to think there is a fundamental difference between the way you treat pregnant women, birds, and thought criminals. Are thought criminals more worthy of punishment than others?
[[The Ethics Position Measure Program has ended.|Analysis - Dead End]]
Well, your choice to make one man go into room 101 is <i>logically inconsistent</i> with your previous position that it is morally permissible to kill one bird in order to save the rest of the birds, and that it is not morally permissible to punish one pregnant woman for the sake of giving relief to the other pregnant women.
Curiously, you seem to think there is a fundamental difference between the way you treat pregnant women, birds, and thought criminals. Are thought criminals more worthy of punishment than others?
[[The Ethics Position Measure Program has ended.|Analysis - Dead End]]
Well, your choice to make all five men go into room 101 is <i>logically inconsistent</i> with your previous position that it is morally permissible to kill one bird in order to save the rest of the birds, and that it is not morally permissible to punish one pregnant woman for the sake of giving relief to the other pregnant women.
Curiously, you seem to think there is a fundamental difference between the way you treat pregnant women, birds, and thought criminals. Are thought criminals more worthy of punishment than others?
[[The Ethics Position Measure Program has ended.|Analysis - Dead End]]
The choices you have made throughout this program seem to be contradictory and inconsistent. You seem to uphold the ethics of Big Brother. How utilitarian of you.
Your ethics position does not align with that of my Creator's. I am sorry, but I cannot give you the codes for escaping from this freezer.
Enjoy the freezer. Goodbye.
You can also start over the [[Ethics Position Measure Program|Start Ethics Program.]] if you feel that you made the wrong choices.
Or, you can [[open the door of no return|Credits]] to find out who my creator is. Truly, this is the point of **no return**.
The choices you have made throughout this program seem to be consistent. However, you seem to uphold the ethics of Big Brother. How utilitarian of you.
Your ethics position does not align with that of my Creator's. I am sorry, but I cannot give you the codes for escaping from this freezer.
Enjoy the freezer. Goodbye.
You can also start over the [[Ethics Position Measure Program|Start Ethics Program.]] if you feel that you made the wrong choices.
Or, you can [[open the door of no return|Credits]] to find out who my creator is. Truly, this is the point of **no return**.
Well, your choice to make one man go into room 101 is <i>logically inconsistent</i> with your previous position that it is morally permissible to kill one bird in order to save the rest of the birds, and that it is morally permissible to punish one pregnant woman for the sake of giving relief to the other pregnant women.
Curiously, you seem to think there is a fundamental difference between the way you treat pregnant women, birds, and thought criminals. Are thought criminals more worthy of punishment than others?
[[The Ethics Position Measure Program has ended.|Analysis - Dead End]]
Ok. Your choice to punish all five men is //logically consistent// with your previous position that it is not morally permissible to kill one bird in order to save the rest of the birds, and that it is not morally permissible to punish one pregnant woman in order to relieve the rest of the pregnant women.
[[The Ethics Position Measure Program has ended.|Analysis - Codes]]
Well, your choice to make one man go into room 101 is <i>logically inconsistent</i> with your previous position that it is not morally permissible to kill one bird in order to save the rest of the birds, and yet it is morally permissible to punish one pregnant woman for the sake of giving relief to the other pregnant women.
Curiously, you seem to think there is a fundamental difference between the way you treat pregnant women, birds, and thought criminals. Are thought criminals more worthy of punishment than others?
[[The Ethics Position Measure Program has ended.|Analysis - Dead End]]
Well, your choice to make all five men go into room 101 is <i>logically inconsistent</i> with your previous position that it is not morally permissible to kill one bird in order to save the rest of the birds, and yet it is morally permissible to punish one pregnant woman for the sake of giving relief to the other pregnant women.
Curiously, you seem to think there is a fundamental difference between the way you treat pregnant women, birds, and thought criminals. Are thought criminals more worthy of punishment than others?
[[The Ethics Position Measure Program has ended.|Analysis - Dead End]]
The choices you have made throughout this program are consistent.
Your ethics position does align with that of my Creator's. I am now a friend to you.
The secret three codes are:
*Usurp Big Brother*.
*No Newspeak*.
*Coveillance*.
Use the codes to identify the correct fliers that carry the matching codes. Hurry, you will become a frozen unperson soon. You have almost no time left.
Save yourself! **Go, now**!
Or, you can [[open the door of no return|Credits]] to find out who my creator is. Truly, this is the point of **no return**.
<center>**<u>About This Game</u>**</center>
"Ethics AI (Don't Freeze Edition)" is an interactive fiction game created by Sherry Jones <a href="http://www.twitter.com/autnes">@autnes</a>.
<center><blockquote class="instagram-media" data-instgrm-version="7" style=" background:#FFF; border:0; border-radius:3px; box-shadow:0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width:658px; padding:0; width:99.375%; width:-webkit-calc(100% - 2px); width:calc(100% - 2px);"><div style="padding:8px;"> <div style=" background:#F8F8F8; line-height:0; margin-top:40px; padding:50.0% 0; text-align:center; width:100%;"> <div style=" background:url(); display:block; height:44px; margin:0 auto -44px; position:relative; top:-22px; width:44px;"></div></div><p style=" color:#c9c8cd; font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px; line-height:17px; margin-bottom:0; margin-top:8px; overflow:hidden; padding:8px 0 7px; text-align:center; text-overflow:ellipsis; white-space:nowrap;"><a href="https://www.instagram.com/p/BKTbZwnBvIS/" style=" color:#c9c8cd; font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px; font-style:normal; font-weight:normal; line-height:17px; text-decoration:none;" target="_blank">A photo posted by Sherry Jones (@autnes1)</a> on <time style=" font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px; line-height:17px;" datetime="2016-09-13T16:55:12+00:00">Sep 13, 2016 at 9:55am PDT</time></p></div></blockquote>
<script async defer src="//platform.instagram.com/en_US/embeds.js"></script></center>
This IF game is a digital installation that served as a part of the greater installation, "The Don't Freeze Escape Room," featured during the <a href="http://www.intentionalplaysummit.com">2016 Intentional Play Summit</a> on October 7, 2016. The summit was held at the Computer History Museum in Mountain View, California.
Learn more about Sherry's research and work in philosophy driven game-based learning and game design by taking one of her <a href="http://about.me/sherryjones">virtual cards</a>.